WASHINGTON, DC 20242 · DC — Ward 6
Building permit — civil plans
HISTORIC & CFA Long Bridge Package LBN 1F Work consists of construction of proposed railroad embankments, storm drainage, fiber optic ductbank, an enhanced bioretention facility, erosion and sediment controls, and maintenance of traffic
Applicant: SF JV · Owner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Building permit — miscellaneous
Long Bridge North- Associated with Design package MD6- Yard 1 and 2, Drill casing for instrumentation and Monitoring for WMATA structure. 2 Locations approx. - 25- 30 ft Depth from ground level.
Applicant: VARUN THOMAS · Owner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Building permit — civil plans
LBN North Package 1B Construction of the WMATA/I-395 bridge substructure with the exception of Pier 3
Applicant: SF JV · Owner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Building permit — civil plans
Long Bridge North Package 1D- The work consists of construction of two retaining walls and a track separator wall, railroad embankments, storm drainage, ductbank, bioretention facility, erosion and sediment controls, MOT and rail infrastructure.
Applicant: PAUL DOLAN · Owner: UNITED STATES
Building permit — civil plans
CFA / H This permit request is related to the Long Bridge South Project, submitted on behalf of the contractor Long Bridge Rail Partners. BCIV permit number is being requested for the project's DU3A Early Package for Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater. The package encompasses both the VA and DC sides of the project, however this permit request is ONLY for the erosion and sediment control elements within DC. The plan package has already been submitted for review to DOEE via the SGS portal - Plan # 7757. As coordinated with DOEE and VPRA, the project is being reviewed as one single E&S and SWM Project within DOEE - with the separate Long Bridge North Project team being responsible for all stormwater management within DC.
Applicant: ANDREW CURTIS · Owner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Published by the District as assessment data, separately from the permit record above, and current as of the District’s own assessment cycle rather than today. An assessment can lag construction by a cycle, so a property with a recently issued permit may still be assessed as it was before the work. Owner details are published by the jurisdiction but are deliberately not shown here.
These are the permits published by the jurisdictions listed above. A project usually depends on approvals from other agencies that publish nothing machine-readable — a forest conservation exemption, a well completion report, a sediment control or grading plan, a utility connection, a homeowners’ association sign-off. Their absence here is not evidence they were not required, and the gaps between the dates above are usually where they happened. Rows labelled “Issued” are ISSUED permits — Washington DC publishes an issue date and no project valuation at all. Records are grouped by normalised address text, so the same property may also appear upstream under a different spelling. Verify scope, dates, and contractor information with the issuing jurisdiction before bidding, quoting, or performing work.